Trump’s big win is set to dominate markets as Burberry sees more weakness in China
By Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB
President Trump’s clean sweep at last week’s election has been confirmed with the Republicans winning the House. This was expected; however, it gave the dollar a boost overnight, and GBP/USD sunk below $1.27. If we don’t see a stabilization in the pound, then it opens the door to a further decline to $1.25. There were some concerns that winning the trifecta of elections could give President elect Trump concentrated power, however, his choice of John Thune for Senate majority leader is interesting – he has clashed with Trump before and was not Elon Musk’s choice for the role. This suggests two things: firstly, that the Trump administration could surprise us. Secondly, that although Republicans now control the main organs of power in the US, the President elect may not get his way on all matters. The question is whether this appointment will halt the Trump trade, stocks are pointing to a lower open in the US, although the dollar remains upbeat.
Trump trade focuses on dollar
The Trump trade has morphed from focusing on the stock market to focusing on a strong dollar and crypto currency gains. The dollar has also been given a boost by a murky outlook for inflation, which may impact Fed rate cuts in the future. The stock market rally is on pause, however, volatility remains low for US stocks, so we do not think that we will see any significant downside in US equities from here.
Burberry: earnings beat estimates, but remain in doldrums
There has been a plethora of earnings data from the UK this morning, including Burberry. The UK luxury goods giant has faced huge challenges in recent months and recently changed its CEO. The news so far suggests that Burberry’s earnings have stabilized. Revenue was £1.09bn, vs. £1.08bn expected, retail sales revenues were stronger than expected at £885mn. However, the luxury goods giant still has a mountain to climb. Mainland China sales have slipped 24%, retail sales fell 21% YoY and the company made a loss in 1H of £41mn, vs. a profit of £233mn last year, however the loss was lower than expected. Added to that, although operating margins fell to -3.8% from 15.9% a year ago, this was also better than the expected -4.53%.
Burberry’s annus horribillus
Make no mistake, Burberry, listed on the FTSE 250, may not have performed as badly as expected, but China sales continue to tumble. The company has a long way to go and is not through its annus horribillis yet.
Burberry’s new CEO, Joshua Schulman, will unveil his turnaround strategy for Burberry later today and all eyes will be on this. There could big changes ahead, including a new strategy that may focus on affordable luxury, Schulman was the ex-CEO of Michael Kors before his Burberry job. He will also need to focus on new markets due to the continued slump in demand for luxury goods in China.
Burberry goes back to its roots
There could also be a move away from handbags and towards outerwear, which is a return to Burberry’s roots. There are questions over the future of Burberry’s artistic director, and there could be questions about the rumored takeover of Burberry by the Italian maker of expensive puffer jackets, Moncler.
The China question is interesting, these results do not consider the stimulus plan that was unveiled in September, and the surge in the Chinese stock market. Although the stimulus disappointed the market, there could be some benefit to Burberry’s China sales later this year. It will worth watching if Schulman gives an outlook for China sales.
What next for the share price?
Burberry’s shares have sunk into these results, and are down 11% in the past week, as Trump’s win in the election is seen as making it harder for luxury companies who have traditionally relied on China for a chunk of their sales. YTD, the share price is down nearly 50%. Thus, the stock market is likely to give an immediate reaction to Schulman’s strategy for the future, either the share price rises in a sign that it approves, or the share price falls further because it continues to think that Burberry will have an execution problem. Overall, UK stock market futures are pointing to a lower open later today.
XTB CY-RISK DECLARATION: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 76% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
XTB UK-RISK DECLARATION: CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 75% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs with XTB Limited UK. You should consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
XTB is a trademark of XTB Group. XTB Group includes but is not limited to following entities:
X-Trade Brokers DM SA is authorised and regulated by the Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF) in Poland
XTB Limited (UK) is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority in United Kingdom (License No. FRN 522157)
XTB Limited (CY) is authorized and regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission in Cyprus. (License No.169/12)
Clients who opened an account from the 1st of January 2021 and are not residing in the UK, are clients of XTB Limited CY.
Disclaimer & Declaration of Interest
The information, investment views and recommendations in this article are provided for general information purposes only. Nothing in this article should be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial product relating to any companies under discussion or to engage in or refrain from doing so or engaging in any other transaction. Any opinions or comments are made to the best of the knowledge and belief of the writer but no responsibility is accepted for actions based on such opinions or comments. Vox Markets may receive payment from companies mentioned for enhanced profiling or publication presence. The writer may or may not hold investments in the companies under discussion.