RBC sees further upside at M&S as momentum builds
RBC Capital Markets has reiterated its 'outperform' rating for , saying the the business is well positioned to defy sector concerns.
As of Friday's close, M&S shares had fallen around 7% so far this year, with investors worried about more aggressive pricing tactics by Asda on M&S's food operations.
However, RBC believes these concerns are "likely overdone", with M&S having the least customer overlap with Asda compared with the other major food retailers. The broker explained that Asda tends to cater for lower-income customers doing a weekly big shop, whereas M&S customers visit for convenience food, last-minute dinners and/or special occasions.
Also, M&S's 50:50 Ocado Retail joint venture should provide more top-line growth, with nearly a third of Ocado Retail sales coming from M&S products.
For the company's clothing and home divisions, RBC said M&S is "pushing on well in areas of existing strength", like knitwear, denim and lingerie, while an improved sourcing outlook - 80% of its clothing is sourced in USD with 80% of FX hedged on a 12 to 18-month basis - should help support margins.
"At 12x CY25 P/E we see potential for further upside as investors reappraise the durability of its growth and exposure to favourable trends, including a flight to quality in food and clothing," the broker said.
M&S shares were down 2.5% at 353.87p by 1156 GMT, outperforming the wider FTSE 100 which was down 4%.
Disclaimer & Declaration of Interest
The information, investment views and recommendations in this article are provided for general information purposes only. Nothing in this article should be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any financial product relating to any companies under discussion or to engage in or refrain from doing so or engaging in any other transaction. Any opinions or comments are made to the best of the knowledge and belief of the writer but no responsibility is accepted for actions based on such opinions or comments. Vox Markets may receive payment from companies mentioned for enhanced profiling or publication presence. The writer may or may not hold investments in the companies under discussion.